<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Court procedure questions give Bunting House a temporary reprieve</title>
		<description>Discuss Court procedure questions give Bunting House a temporary reprieve</description>
		<link>http://www.newsworks.org/index.php/component/flexicontent/items/item/47917-court-procedure-questions-give-bunting-house-a-temporary-reprieve</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 04:33:01 --400</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.newsworks.org/index.php/component/jcomments/feed/com_flexicontent/47917/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>House for Sale</title>
			<link>http://www.newsworks.org/index.php/component/flexicontent/items/item/47917-court-procedure-questions-give-bunting-house-a-temporary-reprieve#comment-50283</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi James, I'm the lawyer. There are no plans to develop the property that I am aware of. However, there are two offers to buy the Bunting house for whatever the fair market value is. One is from a local non-profit. The other is from the principal of a local redevelopment firm working on LEED and historic preservation projects in Philly, Harlem NYC, Baltimore MD, Newark & Salem NJ. Buyers with impeccable restoration qualifications want to purchase the Bunting House. Tenants are eager to rent the Bunting House. What would you do if the owners refuse to consider offers to buy the Bunting House?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Hal</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 23:46:02 --400</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.newsworks.org/index.php/component/flexicontent/items/item/47917-court-procedure-questions-give-bunting-house-a-temporary-reprieve#comment-50283</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bunting House</title>
			<link>http://www.newsworks.org/index.php/component/flexicontent/items/item/47917-court-procedure-questions-give-bunting-house-a-temporary-reprieve#comment-49869</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Simple solution - the community group does not own the house and neither do the neighbors who are tryinig to save the house. Worse of all, the opponents only speak for themselves, not the entire neighborhood. Were the house up for sale, who in the neighborhood would step in to buy it? The lawyer? To delay demolition is to infringe upon the rights of the property owner who is seeking to develop his property.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 12:30:27 --400</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.newsworks.org/index.php/component/flexicontent/items/item/47917-court-procedure-questions-give-bunting-house-a-temporary-reprieve#comment-49869</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
