ewalter@whyy.org
Should allegations against priests not charged in Archdiocese sex abuse case be allowed as evidence?
January 31, 2012
By Eric WalterAs a Catholic physician who has met many who have been sexually abused by priests, I hope that all possible evidence is allowed to be used in the upcoming trial, to let it be known how dysfunctional the leaders of the Roman Catholic Church have been [...]
—Dr McHugh
As one of many here in PA who have crawled out of a hole for at least one other child to be spared, I hope this is a BIG change. For me, I feel as though it may be too late and know how the road will be to get it all back together. […] Please, if you are a victim/survivor, speak out ...YOU ARE NOT ALONE...
—Another survivor
Whatever side the ruling comes down on, the prosecutor has already done a great service by bringing the evidence into the light. Whether or not it can be used against Lynn is less important than the fact of its being out there. [...]
—GBullough
Now if only some of those records, files, correspondence etc., that the members of the two Philadelphia Grand Jury members had access to were put out there in the public venue, individuals would see what some members of church leadership said and wrote when they thought materials were forever sealed and what they said and wrote for public consumption.
—Sister Maureen Paul Turlish
The upcoming trial of three Philadelphia priests accused of sexually abusing young boys is gaining a response from NewsWorks readers.
On Monday, Judge Teresa Sarmina upheld her previous ruling that retired Cardinal Anthony Bevilacqua is competent to be a witness. There had been some question that the 88-year-old mans's significant memory loss would render his testimony unreliable.
Sarmina also announced she would decide within the week whether prosecutors may introduce abuse allegations against priests who are not charged in the case.
How do you think the judge
should rule? Tell us below.
A reader identified as Dr. McHugh said, "As a Catholic physician who has met many who have been sexually abused by priests, I hope that all possible evidence is allowed to be used in the upcoming trial, to let it be known how dysfunctional the leaders of the Roman Catholic Church have been."
NewsWorks reader GBullough said further, "Whatever side the ruling comes down on, the prosecutor has already done a great service by bringing the evidence into the light."
Prosecutors hold that allowing such evidence will show Monsignor William Lynn, who is charged with hiding abuse by relocating accused priests, was continuing a tradition of such cover ups. Lynn's lawyers argue that those allegations are not relevant and would only prejudice the jury against the defendants.
What do you think? Tell us in the comments below.
Your comment